Raffaele Sollecito, from Giovinazzo, Bari, was 23 years of age and approaching the conclusion of the degree in computer engineering in the College of
Perugia during the time of the murder. He’d been the boyfriend of Knox for around two days prior to the duration of Kercher’s murder. Sollecito comes
from an affluent family, the boy of the urologist from Bari. Sollecito would never know Guede and stated not to have come across his title just before news
reviews concerning the murder.
Sollecito stated he is at his flat and spent the evening using his computer around the evening from the murder. Detectives have stated that his alibi isn’t
substantiated by records of his isp, though a personal detective employed by Sollecito disputed this. The defence has contended the hard disk drives of three
computer systems owned by Sollecito and Knox, destroyed through the prosecution’s computer expert when he carried out exams of these, had contained
exculpatory evidence. Like Knox, Sollecito confesses to getting smoked marijuana at the time from the murder.
The prosecution stated that his shoe-print was discovered in bloodstream on the mattress linen in Kercher’s room, which his DNA was on the severed bra
clasp, however the Paternity testing was disputed (as “contamination”) throughout the tests (see below: DNA disputes about bra clasp). The shoe-print also
matched up Guede’s Nike shoe-print using the cloth folded to look like a simplified print.
On 4 December 2009, Raffaele Sollecito was discovered guilty on all counts and sentenced to two-and-a-half decades imprisonment. Like Knox, Sollecito will
next move through the 2 level appeal process in compliance using the rules of Italian Criminal Procedure.
Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito trial
The trial of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito started on 16 The month of january 2009, with much attention in the media. In November 2008, they’d
been indicted by Judge Paolo Micheli, who had presided within the Guede trial in October 2008. These were billed with murder, sexual assault, replicating a
criminal offense (burglary), transporting a knife, and thievery of 300 pounds (~US$440), two charge cards and 2 cell phones.
Personnel involved
The mind district attorney within the trial was Guiliano Mignini. He’d brought the job interview with Amanda Knox by which she suggested as a factor
Patrick Lumumba.[citation needed] Mignini was charged of abuse of office and also the annoying of journalists with regards to another situation on 22 The
month of january 2010.
The main judge was Giancarlo Massei. Deputy judge in the trial was Beatrice Cristiani. A panel of eight idol judges (the 2 professional idol judges and six
lay idol judges) was put together to listen to the situation and see the decisions. Amanda Knox was symbolized in Italia by lawyers Luciano Ghirga and Carlo
Dalla Vedova. Raffaele Sollecito was defended by attorney Giulia Bongiorno. Research have been aided by personnel from Rome. The forensic biologist
Patrizia Stefanoni, who had collected evidence in the crime scene, claimed throughout the trial. There have been a number of other witnesses, such as the
other two housemates within the Kercher-Knox flat (Romanelli and Mezzetti) and citizens of neighbouring qualities.
Court docket occasions
The neutrality of the section is disputed. Please visit the discussion around the talk page. Please not remove this message before the dispute is resolved. (Feb
2010)
In October 2008, well just before the beginning of the trial, a judge within the situation, Paulo Micheli, gave a job interview for an Italian newspaper
released in Perugia, Messaggero Umbria, showing he thought Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito were present in the murder of Kercher. Nonetheless, on
16 The month of january 2009, Knox’s and Sollecito’s lawyers started the particular trial before Judge Giancarlo Massei by stating their clients’ innocence.
Proceedings were held virtually every two days (aside from a summer time break) until 4 December 2009. Rudy Guede attended the trial, but rejected to
testify within the trial. Throughout the very first session, judge Giancarlo Massei declined a request through the Kercher family to keep the trial nowadays.
He ruled the trial could be public, however with closed periods to become made the decision on the situation-by-situation basis.
Knox claimed the very first time on 12 June 2009, pleading her innocence. She told a legal court that they have been with Sollecito in the apartment around
the evening from the murder. Knox claimed that they regarded as Kercher as her friend coupled with no motive to kill her. She also claimed that throughout
her interrogation through the police and district attorney she’d been intimidated, threatened with incarceration striking around the mind, leading to her to
provide false testimony implicating Patrick Lumumba.
The Corte Suprema di Cassazione had ruled her remarks throughout a part of her initial questioning were inadmissible because no lawyer have been
present. These were, however, admissible within the concurrent action against Knox for wrongly accusing Lumumba. Her voluntary handwritten note, partly
rolltop her claims seemed to be open to a legal court throughout the trial.
On 2627 June 2009, 2 Perugia lawyers along with a school director claimed that Rudy Guede have been caught having a large stolen knife (16-inch,
40-centimetres) in the closed Milan school on 27 October 2007 (five days prior to the murder) having a laptop PC reported stolen 14 October 2007 from the
Perugia law office burgled having a rock breaking an upstairs window. The Perugia police were informed Guede had laptops, along with a cell phone also
stolen in the Perugia office using the damaged window. However, Guede was launched through the Milan police, and never moved towards the Perugia
locksmith seattle
police, as claimed through the two Perugia lawyers (lawyers) in the Knox/Sollecito trial hearing on 26 June 2009 by the college director 27 June, who claimed
money seemed to be missing in the office. Hence, the reviews of Guede holding a ladies watch, a hammer, a stolen knife and stolen property from the prior
upstairs-window burglary might be confirmed by Milan police, Perugia police, and also the 2 lawyers whose PC, printer and cell phone were reported stolen
on 14 October 2007. Among the lawyers claimed that Guede made an appearance at his doorstep following the burglary and stated he had bought both PC
and cell phone in a Milan stop (200 miles or 320 km away, in far northern Italia).